AI and Liability: Unraveling the Uncertainties in Indian Law
- Muskan Narang
- Jul 4, 2024
- 3 min read

Introduction
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative technology with vast potential across various sectors in India. From healthcare and finance to transportation and education, AI has already started to shape the way we live and work. However, with this rapid advancement in AI, legal and ethical challenges have also arisen, particularly concerning the issue of liability. As AI systems make decisions and interact with humans, questions about who should be held responsible for AI-related accidents, errors, or harm have become pressing concerns. This article aims to explore the uncertainties surrounding AI liability in Indian law and the potential avenues for addressing these challenges.
Understanding AI Liability
AI liability pertains to the question of attributing responsibility when AI systems cause harm or fail to perform as intended. Unlike traditional products, AI systems possess a level of autonomy in their decision-making processes, leading to complex issues regarding accountability. When AI systems make a mistake or produce unintended outcomes, the blame could be attributed to various parties, including the AI developers, the users, or even the AI itself. This ambiguity presents a unique challenge for the legal system, requiring a comprehensive framework that clarifies roles and responsibilities.
Current State of AI Liability in India
As of the knowledge cutoff in September 2021, India lacked specific laws addressing AI liability comprehensively. However, the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules 2021, which came into effect in February 2021, partly touch upon issues related to AI. These rules make social media platforms and other intermediaries responsible for user-generated content, but they do not directly address AI systems' liability. The general principles of liability in India are governed by tort law, contract law, and consumer protection laws. In tort law, liability arises when there is a breach of duty of care, and negligence can be established. However, determining negligence in the context of AI, where decisions are made based on complex algorithms, is challenging. The legal status of AI systems, whether they should be treated as "legal persons" or mere tools, also adds complexity to the liability issue. As of now, AI systems are considered tools, and their actions are attributed to the human entities using or developing them.
Challenges in AI Liability
Several key challenges contribute to the uncertainties surrounding AI liability in Indian law:
1. Lack of Specific AI Regulations: The absence of dedicated AI laws leaves a void in addressing AI-related liability concerns adequately. There is a need for laws that specifically account for AI's unique characteristics and allocate responsibility accordingly.
2. Explainability and Transparency: Many AI systems, particularly those powered by machine learning algorithms, lack transparency in their decision-making processes. The "black-box" nature of AI makes it difficult to determine the cause of errors, hindering the establishment of liability.
3. Attribution of Responsibility: Assigning liability in complex AI ecosystems involving multiple stakeholders, including developers, users, and data providers, poses a challenge. Differentiating between errors caused by the AI system and those resulting from user input or inadequate data becomes problematic.
4. Emerging AI Technologies: As AI evolves, new technologies such as autonomous vehicles and healthcare AI systems raise novel liability concerns that existing laws may not adequately address.
Potential Solutions and the Way Forward
To address the uncertainties in AI liability, India should consider the following approaches:
1. Developing AI-Specific Regulations: India needs dedicated AI laws that incorporate liability frameworks to address AI-related challenges explicitly. These regulations should strike a balance between promoting innovation and ensuring accountability.
2. Industry Standards and Best Practices: Establishing industry standards and best practices for AI development and deployment can encourage responsible AI use and help mitigate liability risks.
3. Algorithmic Transparency: Encouraging AI developers to create more transparent and interpretable algorithms would facilitate the investigation of errors and provide better insights into decision-making processes.
4. Risk Assessment and Insurance: Introducing AI liability insurance could help mitigate financial risks associated with AI-related accidents or damages, while comprehensive risk assessments can help identify potential areas of concern.
5. International Collaboration: Engaging in international discussions on AI liability can help India learn from global experiences and develop more robust legal frameworks.
Conclusion
As AI continues to shape the future of India's economy and society, clarifying AI liability becomes imperative. The absence of specific AI laws and the complexities associated with AI systems necessitate urgent attention from policymakers, legal experts, and stakeholders. A balanced approach that fosters innovation while ensuring accountability is essential to address the uncertainties surrounding AI liability in Indian law. By charting a clear path forward, India can harness the full potential of AI while safeguarding the rights and interests of its citizens.
Comments